How Srikkanth, Yuvraj can talk

Wednesday, 3 December 2008 11:21 by Rajan Bala
One is aware that even the chairman of the national selection committee, Krishnamachari Srikkanth, has, in inimitable fashion, put his foot in his mouth, when he said Yuvraj Singh is all ready to take Sourav Ganguly’s vacated place in the Test batting order. This statement was the result of the Punjab left-hander scoring two successive ODI centuries against an England team that seemed more rattled on the field than even the employees and the guests of the Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai when the terrorists struck.

In his playing days, Srikkanth was a sort of joker in the pack and it is one of those ironies he is still remembered for his knock of 39 against the West Indies in the World Cup final in 1983. Of course, had India lost the final, the Tamil Nadu player would never have been remembered.

However, ever since then, he has not stopped talking and maybe this has helped him become the chairman of the selection committee. For someone who averaged less than 30 in both Tests and ODIs, it is rather a privileged position to be in. Has there been anyone luckier in Indian cricket, even captaining the country by default?

The talking disease has been passed on to Yuvraj. Take this statement attributed to this player. Answering a question about his getting back into the Test team, Yuvraj replied, “Hopefully that will happen. Now that Sourav Ganguly has retired I really hope to fit into his shoes and deliver it for the country.” 

The point is, Yuvraj has been encouraged to talk in this vein because of Srikkanth. It is unfair to other aspirants for the same batting position, Suresh Raina and Rohit Sharma, unless of course, Srikkanth has already convinced his co-selectors about Yuvraj’s credentials. It is an unhealthy trend and should be discouraged by the Board of Control for Cricket in India.

Also, why is so much of a fuss being made about a leak from the proceedings of the selection committee, when the chairman is a blabbermouth?

Currently rated 2.0 by 14 people

  • Currently 2/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

December 2. 2008 11:05

Nandakumar

I have been reading Rajan Bala's column in The Indian Express since my childhood. A respected person like him should'nt be tongue lashing somebody like Srikanth who has played many memorable knocks for the country, while Rajan Bala i doubt whether he had ever stepped on to the cricket field for playing the game. V all know how Rajan Bala was supporting Greg Chappel voiceferously while the later was coach, d led the whole indian cricket into shambles d chaos d also not to forget the disastrous world cup. its easy to sit at home and write something rubbish, rather take the responsibility in choosing a playing 11 for the country's cricket team to represent a population of more than 100 million. coming to the point of giving chances for Rohit Sharma d Raina, i think Yuvraj has been around for more than 8 years now d should be given the preference, for Rohit d Raina their time will come, till then they have to play in the domestic competitions d keep proving themselves.

Nandakumar

December 2. 2008 14:09

K.V.Natarajan

Mr.Rajan Bala gossips endlessly. I don't know how people can tolerate his gossip. He talks less of cricket and gossips more. It is high time express stops wasting valuable webside for this man.

K.V.Natarajan

December 3. 2008 14:48

venki

I think age is catching up with you. Maybe Srikant may not leak intenal reports to you as Chappel did!!! that is why you are angry.

venki

December 3. 2008 21:19

Naveen

So.. what do you say? After 2 centuries, other good knocks and wickets in 5 onedayers that happened before England was rattled by the terror atacks, still Yuvraj should not get his place back? Is there a reason to bypass Yuvraj and select raina, rohit.. whoever? What credentials did they have?

Or are you saying that Srikkanth should not talk? When a nobody like you can write an blog and somebody like me can comment on it then why can't the chairman of selection commitee talk! He likes to be media savvy so whats your problem.

Yes - You are correct that Srikkanth was never a consistent player and his average is very average! but those were the standards when he played. For a fair bit he was India's leading run scorer in one dayers and he also had maximum number of 100's by a player for some time... and opposition bowlers feared him even when he was on 0 from 30 balls. Also, strangely he was the only indian bowler with two 5 wicket hauls in onedayers for a long time!

Srikkanth scorecard a modest 39 that turned out to be the highest scorecard in a victorious worldcup final against the mighty west indies of early 80's that is his credentials. You sit at your desk writing about it.. that is your credential.

Naveen

December 3. 2008 21:19

Naveen

So.. what do you say? After 2 centuries, other good knocks and wickets in 5 onedayers that happened before England was rattled by the terror atacks, still Yuvraj should not get his place back? Is there a reason to bypass Yuvraj and select raina, rohit.. whoever? What credentials did they have?

Or are you saying that Srikkanth should not talk? When a nobody like you can write an blog and somebody like me can comment on it then why can't the chairman of selection commitee talk! He likes to be media savvy so whats your problem.

Yes - You are correct that Srikkanth was never a consistent player and his average is very average! but those were the standards when he played. For a fair bit he was India's leading run scorer in one dayers and he also had maximum number of 100's by a player for some time... and opposition bowlers feared him even when he was on 0 from 30 balls. Also, strangely he was the only indian bowler with two 5 wicket hauls in onedayers for a long time!

Srikkanth scorecard a modest 39 that turned out to be the highest scorecard in a victorious worldcup final against the mighty west indies of early 80's that is his credentials. You sit at your desk writing about it.. that is your credential.

Naveen

December 3. 2008 21:21

Naveen

a few spelling mistakes in my post above. pls ignore them.

Naveen

December 4. 2008 08:37

Rajesh

Hi Rajan,

Please stooping to the level of putting all of yourself in your mouth, maybe you have stopped thinking after all the mouth of yours is so "SPIRITED" that you do not know where to look. Thank God, you remember him scoring 38 and not 39, and so many memorable knocks for India. You do not what the Cricket Field is but have seen it from the portals of the KSCA Club House having those spirits. Shut yourself and talk cricket, where you not the one who spotted in a Chink in Sunny's Cover Drive? Come on grow up, let's remember you when you are gone, unlike so many of your ilk.

Rajesh

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



click here