Thirst Not for More Blood

Friday, 5 December 2008 12:01 by Sreejay S
The atmosphere has become toxic after the Mumbai terror attacks, so much so that hysteria seems the prevalent mood.

People are calling for war. People want death - blood, destruction.

But, really, how many really wants it? In a response to a comment on a previous post, I was rather rude to someone whom I assume to be young lady. I will not apologise for my response, but I sincerely regret my tone.

The truth of the matter is, I am a bit fed up with this "Off with their heads" responses.

Who do we fight, and why?

Would a Hindu want to go out into the streets and kill the first Muslim you come across? And in retaliation, would you have a Muslim go out and kill a Hindu, a thousand miles away? Ridiculous.

The deaths and destruction we saw in Mumbai is the climax of decades of systemic apathy. It is the result of generations of irresponsibility. The perpetrators are, simply put, terrorists - whether they claim to be Muslims or not, Pakistanis or not.

Have you seen a live brain pulsing through a broken skull? I have. I have smelled stale blood. I have faced crazed people who were trying to set fire to the boat I was in, on the Arabian Sea. These are not pretty or exciting sensations. Nor is the smell of a hot gun barrel...

War is easy to talk. What would you have happen now? To see tens of thousands of soldiers march off to the border, attack another set of soldiers, kill each other mindlessly for a few days...till the international pressure makes both countries take a step back, and status quo ante bellum is restored...

Only, to a few thousand families, the status quo will never be ante bellum. They will have dead bodies to receive, invalids to tend, losses to count.

Or, would you have a few nuclear missiles shot over the border, to kill untold numbers, only to have retaliatory strikes take another number of lives here?

Oh, yes, I am sure our armed forces have contingency plans for all these scenarios. But do remember, they are for 'contingencies' and they are only 'plans'.

Do not, in your wildest dreams, imagine that India will be able to attack Pakistan and come off unscathed. Especially at this moment, Pakistan is a desperate nation. The paranoia and institutional fear of India will, in all probability, force them to use nuclear weapons first, and damn the consequences - for an animal afraid for its survival is impervious to consequences. And the people who have always been in power in that unfortunate country have also been unstable.

True, hypothetically, in a war, India would 'win'. But, how do you measure victory? By lesser number of deaths? Or by the higher number of survivors? And whose life are you willing to sacrifice? Yours? Or those nameless soldiers in green and camouflage?

You might then ask, why do we have an Army...

This is not the 19th century, or even the 20th, where a nation can invade another with impunity. The defence forces are exactly for that - defence. How have the USA gained by attacking Iraq? Or invading Afghanistan? If there were no more attacks on the US after 9/11, it is not because GW Bush was a great president. To all practical purposes, USA is an island. But, is the danger any less after 9/11...? Time is the key.

What we must do is to see why we had to suffer through Mumbai and countless other attacks before that...

Sixty years ago, seeds of hate were sown as India was wrenched apart. We have been presented with the fruits throughout our history till now. We owe it to ourselves to look around and see, is the hate worth it?

We cannot discover a new set of leaders, out of the blue, just because we do not like the present crop. What we can do is ask for a bit more responsibility from those we elect to represent, legislate and administrate for us.

We call the people we choose 'leaders', for want of a better word. They are our representatives. They are the reflection of what we are. They reflect us, in all the imperfections we ourselves suffer. We make them powerful because we hate to assume responsibility.

Let us, at least now, take some of that responsibility - and ask for answers. Jingoism leads to a blind alley, bigotry to darkness. Be tolerant, be more aware, be more questioning. Let us not, above all, elevate these 'leaders' to such height that they are unreachable. They are not gods, they are not mothers or fathers, they are just as human as we are. Keep them human...

We owe it to our children.

One more thing... Watch this: Ofra Haza. This is a Yemeni Jew, from Israel, singing lyrics written in English, Hebrew and Arabic, performing in Turkey. I could have chosen many an Indian video, but this seems so appropriate, especially as she died of AIDS, contracted from her husband...

Currently rated 3.2 by 11 people

  • Currently 3.181818/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , , , , ,
Categories:  
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (7) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Comments

December 6. 2008 19:21

naresh venkat


It is a good piece talking sense out of euphoria all around --but pacifism is all nice to talk -but doesn`t help much in a world ravaged by hypocrisy , bigotry, deceit and real politik . Perhaps as Saddam rightly said sometimes it is necessary to wage the mother of all wars to end wars.
Naresh Venkat

naresh venkat

December 6. 2008 22:12

Sreejay S

Naresh,

We have had enough wars in this world - let us leave it to the First World to fight them out.

If we need to, we HAVE to fight, I agree, and fight well.

The issue here is, why provoke one, that too, when the result can be achieved with politics, diplomacy and especially, economics?

And, do not forget, Saddam lost.

Sreejay S

December 7. 2008 18:24

Amar

I think the author seems to be naïve otherwise good literary piece but with less common sense! A country is not prepared to take decisive action bound to fail over the period of time, slowly but surely. I am not sure whether author expects India to become Kashmir (where Hindus have to become refugees) by continuing to light Candles near dead bodies of innocents!!

Yes, war is not going to be beautiful not the best solution, in a given scenario anyone would avoid but WILL use it as the last option. The WILL of use is where your nerve is tested. No Nuclear weapon was used during limited war waged on Kargil.

Author’s fundamental assumption is that India should fear for Muslims aka Pakistanis and yield to their tactics till Hindus become irrelevant mass! In Kashmir I can bet no one is even ready to talk about plight of Hindus because they are minorities while we have continuous coverage even today on Gujarath’s aftermath.

Easier approach is to live on denial and praying to be lucky but keep getting hit by terrorists. Other option is NOT the easier one but requires sacrifices from all nationalistic families, rich-to-poor, illiterates-to-scientists, carpenters-to-CEOs!!! Unless you are part of the solution you can never understand what it is.

Had rest of the world waited for Hitler to change his mind, the World today would be lot different from what it is now! Sometimes, as God of all Lords Krishna puts it, you need to take arm, ready to establish dharma.

Amar

December 7. 2008 22:33

naresh venkat


Sreejay,
A good rejoinder too from you --I agree that we should not be the one to provoke a war --and India certainly has a long history of not provoking nor being provoked into waging a war even when can win for sure --as in the case of Pak now -
I do hope we really win with diplomacy and tact this time around . I agree the costs of even a sure win war is enormous in terms of lives, growth, trauma, and hardship on the people

But I wish to point out that a small country like Vietnam fought and won a valiant long drawn war imposed unjustly on them by US for a long 25 odd years --only depending on their people and their spirit to live independently of US hegemony.
Of course the terrorism played out by US on Vietnam was of a different kind those days compared to Pak Variety now.
Naresh Venkat

naresh venkat

December 8. 2008 00:08

naresh venkat


A good rejoinder --I agree that wars are disastrous for us in terms of lives, trauma, hardship for the people and growth and economy--even if can be sure to win one against Pak .
I do hope we expose the Paki bluff this time to the whole world by diplomacy tact and international pressure.
But war is an extension of politics by other means-said a famous statesman long back when such wars were unknown and never waged,--History has always proved from the days of Mahabaratha one provoking an unjust war on the rightful one always loses in the end --like Pak also would-- not too far in future.
Naresh Venkat

naresh venkat

December 9. 2008 06:05

Layman

Sreejay,
One always wonders at this line of thought by those of who are educated. Do we ever wonder that we have a responsibilities towards our countrymen, who are uneducated?

During the past two decades we, as a nation have become wealthier. But wealth carries its own responsibilities. It means that we need to develop the ability to defend that extra wealth. We have been subjected to numerous attacks. In such attacks, both educated and the uneducated get killed.

We can say that that the educated CHOSE to be unprepared, underarmed and unprepared. We CHOOSE to disregard that the enemy chose the day and the battlefield - we were unprepared. We chose to hide behind words - words that the enemy does not understand. There's a price for this indifference, for this denial of reality.

What about the uneducated? What crime did they commit? (At least, we were were stupid to trust the enemy). The uneducated depend on us to take the right decisions, for their livelihood and indeed their lives. Why should they pay for our indifference? Our indifference means only one thing - that we felt our fellow brethren to be dispensable. No fancy words, no hair-splitting can hide that.

Now that events are over - lets have the courage to examine our conscience. For once, lets not hide behind fancy words.

Layman

December 9. 2008 07:42

Sreejay S

Amar,
Pleased to see someone disagree without any name-calling...
You say that my "fundamental assumption is that India should fear for Muslims aka Pakistanis". Not so. My assumption is that we, as a nation, is more balanced and mature than that unfortunate 'nation', which has no reason to exist except a vague sense of fear from India.
The Hitler analogy is apt - to a point. Unfortunately, the world, in its race to material comfort, has forgotten how to come together and fight for a caus. Will today's rhetoric of UN action sustain beyond a few months? Time will tell
As far as the Gita goes, I am not against action - I am for CONSIDERED action. Remember, Kurukshetra resulted after the last attempt for peace evaporated in front of Dhuryodhana.

Naresh,
I couldn't agree more. Let us see how much the temperature cools down. The only caveat is, we should NEVER forget, once 'normalcy' comes back.

Layman,
You say - "the educated CHOSE to be unprepared, underarmed and unprepared'. True. That's what I say in earlier posts too - we, as a class, decided to disconnect.
And please do not underestimate the 'uneducated' as you call them. I respect the voiceless mass of our polity. They are not moved by the hysterics of our 'protest class' - those described (unfortunately, but rather aptly) as 'the lipstick and powder behenjis' by Mukhthar Abbas Naqvi!
It is the masses who contributed to the strengths of our nation. Let us not assume their responsibilities - let us just realise ours. Like you say - do not hide behind words - use them to question those who have to answer.

Sreejay S

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading





click here