Some Bad Cheer for the Season

Thursday, 25 December 2008 00:14 by Sreejay S
Okay – it’s time to take off the velvet gloves. I have, in previous posts, always advocated moderation, taking a deep breath and a bit of balance in or response to our western neighbour.

Unfortunately, Pakistan is as burdened with bad leadership as India is. They are more scared of facing the truth of the growing anarchy and terror inside their own boundaries than they are of facing down India. Worse for both the countries, the Pakistani army has more influence than their Indian counterparts, in the day to day running of the country.

So, is it time for war?

Firstly, let me assure you, despite all the moderation I have been advocating in my older posts, both through my articles as well as my comments, I am not an unreasoning pacifist. I am one who believes that armed force is not something to be undertaken lightly, on the spur of the moment.

Secondly, I still think that a shooting war is not the answer… Wait, I can hear all of those groans and desk-thumping. Wait – I am not saying that we should do nothing. In fact, I am saying that we should do something far more effective than war.

Have you seen the political mood in the world now? Just let me summarise it briefly – those parts that we need in India’s favour.

1) The USA and the West in general are very much upset with Pakistan and at the same time are in a situation where they find themselves hamstrung financially.
2) China, for the first time, has gone along with the Indian demands of banning terror organisations in Pakistan.
3) Pakistan is practically broke, running around the world with begging bowl.
4) Our ties with Afghanistan and Iran are excellent, with the former not at all pleased with Pakistan.
5) The Taliban has declared support to Pakistan.

Of course, there are more factors I can add to the above. But, for my purpose, this will suffice.

So what should we do?

Firstly, break all diplomatic relations with Pakistan. Surprisingly enough, we still have not done that!

Secondly, make sure that we reconcile urgent differences with China, including a non-interference agreement.

Thirdly, strengthen our Navy presence in the Arabian Sea, with stronger support from the Western and Southern commands of the Air Force.  After all, the Mumbai attacks came from the sea and we are within our rights to control the traffic on that shore. If we happen to interrupt any Pakistani commerce, that will only be incidental.

Fourthly, make sure that the Gulf States (especially Saudi Arabia) understand that we will not be pleased if their funding of Pakistani institutions continues.

Fifth, ask Afghanistan and Iran to cooperate in making sure that no help reaches the Talibani forces through their countries.

Finally, and most importantly, make sure that Pakistan does not receive any financial aid in the near future, or till they acknowledge and take action against the terror elements in their midst, whether institutional or otherwise.

Will these measures work?

I am not sure. I am nothing more than an armchair diplomat. But, I can say this; these measures will surely hurt more than a shooting war. After actual armed conflict, once the hostilities are ended (probably within days), Pakistan will be able to get more help from outside to rebuild. With economic and diplomatic measures, no one will be able to say that India was an aggressor. Also, it will be harder for countries like Saudi Arabia and China to justify increases in funding or help.

What will be the reaction(s)?

Well, there will certainly be a loud hue and cry about it from Pakistan. If we can keep China placated, we should be okay. The US and Europe will wag their fingers at us – but will not do anything, as they themselves are tired of the whole mess in Pakistan.

There is a very good chance though, that these measures will be a fuse. It will probably enthuse more ‘fidayeen’ to attack India.

The Pak army will certainly want to take direct action. In fact, that would almost certainly happen. So, in the end, it may end in a shooting war after all – but at least then we will be totally justified to defend ourselves and finish the task once and for all.

What task? The complete destruction of all terror infrastructure in that country. If we do a pre-emptive strike, we will have to leave it half-done.

What I say is, if we are going after the hornet’s nest, make sure that it is full burnt – or we will be stung.

One last word…

Will all these happen? Of course not – because our ‘leaders’ have their hands stuck in some deep part of their anatomy. My solution is just speculation – our ‘leaders’ do not have time to even speculate. After all, the parliamentary elections are coming – and what is more important than that?

Currently rated 4.6 by 8 people

  • Currently 4.625/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , ,
Categories:  
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (13) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Comments

December 24. 2008 11:43

arun

its christmas and i dont wont to spoil it but then i read ur blog and started to worry

arun

December 24. 2008 14:25

Sreejay S

Arun,
It is unfortunate, but we HAVE to worry.

Anyway, Merry Christmas... Smile

Sreejay S

December 24. 2008 23:04

UNCLE SAM

Sir,

do u say that India is a beggar country and we Indians are beggars and get sympathy from china,US and West

u still are getting the wrong end of the sword

UNCLE SAM

December 25. 2008 00:08

Sreejay S

Uncle Sam (strange name for someone who doesn't like the USA!),
India is not a 'beggar country' as you say in your exquisite English.

On the other hand, yes, we need support from these countries. Or at least a hands-off approach.

Whatever you may imagine, India does not have the wherewithal to stand against the world. All and any one of these countries have better equipped armies and stronger production bases.

All we have are numbers in our favour (not even that in China's case). We are under-equipped, under-trained and unprepared according to Western standards. Why? Because Indians never ask what happen to their soldiers, nor do they care, as long as there are no conflicts.

So don't jump around beating your chest, saying "bring on the world".

Sreejay S

December 25. 2008 20:08

Amar

What you have suggested is nothing more than beating around the bushes instead of taking the fight heads-on. Existence of Pakistan is purely a counter measure for the emergence of India in the world stage. Unfortunately, this strategy is sponsored by both China and US with whom you are asking for help. Pakistan as an entity merely executing orders coming from various sides. They are able to achieve their objectives easily because of proximity and easy distribution of network across India with certain communal affiliation which proves to be an effective way to motivate people against India. Kashmir is just a symbolic means to achieve these objectives with minimum PR effort. On top of that English Media in India is helping those who are against India, including China. Because in India it is easy to get away for treason and it becomes dangerous if you show your patriotism – if you are patriotic and nationalistic then you are deemed to be a bad guy. If you support terrorists and separatists then you become secular hero. This is the unfortunate truth.

Coming back to the original issue, Pakistan(as a political entity – not people) is openly waging 1000 years war and can afford to lose as many yet can prevail upon. It is indulging in 1000 cuts strategy and can afford to lose as many wars. On the contrary, India is in a risky proposition where it can’t even lose a single war and think of prevailing after that!!!! Just look back history, you will know what I mean – Gazni afford to lose 17 times yet was alive but Somnath King lost just one war and consequences are there for 1000 years to see!!!

Indians must stop pretending that good sense will prevail up on Pakistan. India not only needs to wage war against Pakistan and it must ensure that there will not be any entity called Pakistan & Bangladesh after the war. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh must be amalgamated with India. After this war, Pakistan should never have any army apparatuses or intelligence agency under their command.

Again, remember after Pearl Horber attack, America did not just wage war against Japan but it went on to dismantle their entire military infrastructure forever, even today as we speak.
Are we ready for sacrifices?

Amar

December 25. 2008 21:54

COMRADE SAM

i am not from US or support them i am a human who thinks all countries are equal i also like USSR, but as i am born in India i want it to be good, free from terror and become a developed country,

i may not be good in english like u editors, journo jerks, but my point is that India should not go down to any countries.

JAI HIND

and a small suggestion dont take perosnally just for fun as ur blogs are favoring the bad idotic relgion (mulsim, islam) u could change ur name "sreeislam" not jai is hind

COMRADE SAM

December 26. 2008 00:43

Sreejay S

Sam (?), And my old friend (Wink) Amar,

Except for your dislike of me personally, I do not see anything new in what you suggest.

History never won any wars. As for destroying a country or two, we are not in the 19th Century - nor are we powerful enough to do that.

I wish you young (presumably) people would take a look at reality. As I said in my previous post, India would (just) win a war. But, no destruction will result, except loss of life on both sides and we will be left with status quo ante.

As for comparing India with the USA, it is just laughable - have you really seen our country? Proud as I am of our culture, we are a poor country, with very little resources, pitiable production bases and less technological aids.

If you imagine that we will be able to match the vast production and resource capital USA was able to mobilise during WWII, you are dreaming. And a draw will get us nowhere in a war.

Try to out-think an enemy, out-learn him - not try to out-talk him.

By the way, have either of you served in the Armed forces? Or even tried to enlist Wink?


Sreejay S

December 26. 2008 02:19

Amar

Mr Sreejay,
Looks like we are breaking your nerve to make you get personal!!! So long we are able to break your head in understanding the subject, it certainly helps a lot.
If Pakistan can survive as a country every time it loses a war (I mean few times it has lost against India), I do not think why India cannot survive after a decisive war unless fear mongers continuously instil fear!
With half-measures and indecisive actions, India bound to get bleed for long term and certainly our generations to come will not appreciate that. Atleast, we have the advantage of whatever numbers or size or power or moral authority.

Amar

December 26. 2008 14:07

Sreejay S

Amar,

Again, the question repeats again and again - does India have the capability? The answer is no...

And if you imagine we can live alone in the world and survive, you really do need to think a lot more about this.

As far as getting personal is concerned - I have seen a bit of this world and not much can get on my nerve. Break my nerve? Not even hardened criminals could do that...

I am just impatient with stupidity. And yes, I do have the blessing (or is it curse?) of irony...

Wink

Sreejay S

December 27. 2008 06:59

Vvijay

GOOD WORK mR EDITOR, i appreciate ur message that a war cannot be solution for peace.

Vvijay

December 27. 2008 18:59

Sreejay S

Vijay,

Thank you Smile

Sreejay S

December 28. 2008 05:16

arun

a great blog keep it up

arun

December 28. 2008 08:28

Sreejay S

Arun,

Thank you Smile

Sreejay S

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading





click here