Keep Vengsarkar away from TV, please

Saturday, 14 February 2009 12:29 by Rajan Bala
Dilip Vengsarkar was a fine batsman, not a great one.  Because of his proximity to former BCCI president Sharad Pawar, he held important positions. He was the chief   Talent Recruiting Development Officer of the BCCI and then became the chairman of the national selection committee. During his tenure in the latter capacity he wanted to continue to write his highly paid syndicated newspaper column, to which the BCCI refused permission. Though he complained of a major financial loss, he continued as chairman because the last thing he could afford to do was to either embarrass Pawar or, for that matter, take him on.

When Sunil Gavaskar had to make a choice between his career as a broadcaster and columnist and a position on the International Cricket Council (ICC), he chose the former because it is far more lucrative.

Former Indian cricketers have learnt quickly that there is money to be earned and constant exposure on television, by jumping on to the bandwagon. The more the merrier seems to be the philosophy, as also a common belief that there is enough money to be shared.

However, cricket lovers would have found it acceptable if someone like Vengsarkar had become an expert on Marathi television. Since there is no limit to ambition he decided to have his say in English. Hence, he accepted the challenge of becoming an expert in the recent ODI series between India and Sri Lanka.

Put alongside the former India fast bowler Javagal Srinath – articulate and enlightened – Vengsarkar looked out of depth, especially because of his limitations in expressing himself in English. Of course, to the detriment of viewers he will continue to persist as a television expert and because of his status as a cricketer will be invited. As this sports television channel has a stranglehold on Indian cricket, the viewer has no choice. A case of like it or lump it.

A simple suggestion – why not replace Vengsarkar with Anil Kumble? He probably has the best modulated style of speaking among all former cricketers. It would be a pleasure to hear him and be spared the agony of Vengsarkar’s attempts to speak in English. Making three Test hundreds at Lord’s unfortunately does not help improve one’s diction and vocabulary in English!

Currently rated 3.6 by 5 people

  • Currently 3.6/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

February 12. 2009 15:08

harisank

Reasonable argument. But who bothers for the proper english diction and all during the TV commentaries, that too from an expert commentattor. Think he will continue unless he is really tensed up to speak in english. Kumble is manytimes better and his time would definetely come soon.

harisank

February 13. 2009 13:35

N ln

Wonderful analysis. Exactly, the same sentiments and perspectives that i felt when watching the 'great' Vengsarkar. The 'GREAT' Gavaskar[he was truly exceptional] had his own personal dogmatics and Vengsarkar even more so... the destruction of the "WALL" was his handiwork!
It was difficult to see him squirm and talk English when pitted against Srinivasan Radhakrishnan's immaculate English.
The final comment in the note was nicely written. Let Vengsarkar not be troubled anymore;please!

N ln

February 14. 2009 10:22

N ln

My thoughts entirely and put so beautifully by the Expert.
It was ever so difficult to see the 'great' selector squirm pitifully in the presence of S.Radhakrishnan's immaculate English. Of course, he considers himself great; he disrupted another stylish batsmen from the south, TE Srinivasan, now he broke the 'WALL' and so ! Well defined - fine, but not great - would he understand that?
Please let us have some real experts, who may also speak.

N ln

February 16. 2009 04:06

Sanfolder

Very true. Vengsarkar is miserable and it shows. hopefully NEO cricket doesnt end up being like our DoorDarshan. Atleast for commercial sake they change.

Sanfolder

February 17. 2009 08:18

Venkatesh V

I never thought Rajan Bala will write a very bad article like this one. I was never a fan of Dilip Vengsarkar, but I still regard him as one of the best stroke-makers India ever produced.
Proficiency in 'English' is not mandatory for any expert who wishes to share his expertise in the media. I strongly believe that majority of cricket fans will find no problem with Vengsarkar's English.
Rajan Bala, lets come out of this 'colonial mindset' of British Raj days.

Venkatesh V

February 22. 2009 01:31

Varada Murthy

This is what even I felt when watching him on the TV.
I agree with Rajan's views.
Vengasarkar may have the cricketing knowledge to share, but it's a fact that he has poor communication skills. It's a specialised job and not all players have the skills, but all of them can have. If Vengsarkar wants to have his say in English, in my opinion, he better improve his communication skills.

Varada Murthy

Varada Murthy

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading





click here